I get it. Social media, outside of a few select areas, takes a fairly liberal bias. And there’s more than a few folks who believe that being liberal is consistent with being educated. I get that. As a lawyer, I’m one hundred percent committed to upholding your constitutional rights to free speech, assembly, and petitioning the government. That’s guaranteed by our Constitution, which is a pretty unique document and guarantee of your rights and liberties as an American citizen.
Here’s where I dissent. There’s a lot of hashtag activism going on in the medical world on social media. There’s a ton of people who’ve taken some very strong positions because they disagree with the current President of the United States. That is well and good. Again, it is your constitutional right. I have two objections to this mindset. First, there’s a bit of a violation of trust with the consumers of these clinicians’ social media feeds. When your social media presence is that of a “Free and Open Access to Medicine” (aka FOAM) advocate, I rarely expect to see politics. I expect to see medicine. As both an attorney and a medical professional, I get that one may hold strong views and perhaps even consider them as part of your professional identity. I don’t expect to see a veiled insinuation (or in some cases, outright statement) that opposing the position of the United States government is part of one’s ethical obligation as a clinician. Further, I don’t expect to see the continued belief that being “educated” means you take a certain political worldview. Perhaps we should recall and recollect about the collective clucking of tongues at physicians and pharmacists who refused to be involve with the “morning after” pill.
By all means, if you’re asked to do something unethical, stand up. Stand up for your beliefs as well. But using your megaphone to shout your beliefs in the ears of those who you’ve brought to your social media home to hear about medicine is, in this guy’s opinion, a violation of that trust. And that goes doubly so when the dissent doesn’t even involve the practice of medicine.