Not Everyone Gets a Trophy — or a Patch

No matter what your view is on what constitutes a “legitimate” request for an EMS response, we all agree (or in theory, should agree) that a patient calling 911 is experiencing a bad day. Even the lowest acuity call deserves a response from an educated, competent, and ideally, compassionate, caregiver, regardless of certification level.

As I look at some of the Internet and Facebook forums devoted and dedicated to EMS, I see a lot of posts full of spelling errors.  I see a lot of posts asking questions that either shouldn’t be asked in a public forum or should be considered common knowledge in emergency medicine.  And of course, I see posts begging for help on passing the National Registry exam on the student’s sixth and final attempt. Many times, I ignore these posts and shake my head.  Sometimes, I let my snarky humor emerge.  My good friend and fellow blogger, EMS Artifact, used to give these shining exemplars of the future of EMS a Mickey D’s job application as a helpful hint.

Why do I not always encourage little Johnny or Susie to “be all they can be” and be a real lifesaver?  Simple.

Emergency medicine is too important to lower our standards to the point that everyone gets a trophy — or a gold colored National Registry patch.  This is why I refuse to coddle students, tolerate poor patient care, or be supportive to the person who asks for help on passing Registry on their sixth attempt.   We’re in the business of caring for the weakest and most vulnerable of society.  That demands high standards.  And if you’re complaining about the lack of professional respect or financial stability in EMS, then we should be setting the standards for excellence — not minimal competence.

If this makes me a paragod or an arrogant prick, then so be it.  Maybe we need just a few more paragods or arrogant pricks in EMS.

(Another) reason why EMS isn’t taken seriously

EMS providers love to claim that “EMS isn’t taken seriously” by you-name-the-other-healthcare-profession.  And we’re right.  We rarely are taken seriously.  I’ve complained before about some of the reasons why.  (See also: T-shirts with flaming skulls and sayings about “Racing the Reaper” and “Doing Everything That a Doctor Does at 80 miles per hour.)

But today, I stumbled on another reason why we shouldn’t be taken seriously.   EMS professionals of all levels fail to grasp the science behind what we do.  I’m not talking about an EMT being unfamiliar with the Krebs cycle or even a paramedic not being able to explain why Trendelenburg is bunk.

What I’m talking about is more fundamental.  It’s about a failure to understand the scientific method, which subsequently adds to the continued issues with medics lacking critical thinking skills or understanding research.  This morning, I saw at least two experienced paramedics on Facebook hawking pseudoscientific woo as diet/health supplements.   Either they’re con artists or they lack the basic scientific literacy to understand that there’s ZERO science or evidence behind the overwhelming majority of these products.  Let’s not even discuss the amount of EMS providers who are vaccine deniers.  I won’t even give them the courtesy of invalidating their beliefs.  To me, vaccine deniers are the medical version of Holocaust deniers.

And then, there’s the other extreme in EMS.  We have the pedants who claim to be advocates of science and “evidence based medicine.”   All too often, though, these “experts” will immediately advocate massive changes in medical practice based on one journal article.  Sometimes, these experts don’t even critically analyze the article.  Patient who receive morphine in acute coronary events have worse outcomes?  Their solution?  Ban morphine administration.  Critical takeaway — most patients who receive morphine in acute coronary events receive morphine only because the nitroglycerine failed to relieve their chest pain.  Did it ever occur that the patients with more acute pain might be having a more extensive event?  Nope.  To the nattering nabobs of negativity who self-appoint themselves as “EMS research experts,” one journal article is enough to limit the EMS skills arsenal or drug formulary.  Yet, these same experts usually want multiple studies to enhance EMS skills or drugs because “the science hasn’t been proven yet.”  Folks, it’s a rare case when one journal article should change your practice.

I’ve blogged before about the shameful state of EMS legal education.  It’s somewhat understandable as EMS isn’t run by attorneys.  (And that’s probably a good thing, excluding your favorite blogger not named Kelly Grayson….)  But EMS is medical practice.  And medical practice is supposed to based upon science.  For EMS providers of any level to not understand the scientific method and inject a healthy dose of skepticism to most claims is to fail as medical providers.  And that, my dear minions, is yet another reason why we’re ambulance drivers and not healthcare professionals.

Core Maxims of EMS

Here are a few of my core observations and beliefs about EMS.

1) You can never go wrong catering to the lowest common denominator of EMS.  The success of Facebook groups like The Most Interesting Ambulance Crew In The World and t-shirts with themes including cutting clothes off of patients continues to prove this maxim.

2) Until EMS engages itself in political advocacy, our future and agenda will always be subject to the whims of others, whether it’s the nursing lobby, the fire service, or unelected bureaucrats in your state’s health and human services bureaucracy.

3) We’re always looking for the next BIG thing that will advance EMS.  Today’s flavor du jour is “community paramedicine.” As much as I like the idea, I’ve yet to see an easily defined skill set or a knowledge base that’s portable across jurisdictions.

4) As long as we continue to define ourselves by a skill set (e.g. I’m a paramedic, therefore I intubate), we will, at best, remain a vocation.  Honestly, right now, we’re a collection of skills more or less randomly put together as “things that might be useful to know in a medical emergency.”  (Otherwise, how could some universities offer a 2 week program for nurses and physicians to become paramedics?)

5) What passes for our education prepares us for emergency medicine.  What our call volumes is typically represents urgent and primary care with a few actual emergencies on occasion.

6) There’s a joke about leaving two firefighters in a room with a ball bearing and that it would be broken in an hour.  Leave two medics in a room for an hour and there will be a clique of “cool kids” and a rumor mill be going.

7) Patients don’t know how good your medical skills or knowledge are.  They are more than capable of figuring out whether or not you actually care for them.

8) If you’ve seen one EMS system, you’ve seen one EMS system.  At least in the USA, there’s no one ideal model of EMS system or service delivery.  What’s going to work in Presidio, Texas sure isn’t going to work in downtown Seattle.

9) Any EMS service that constantly bangs the PR drum to tell you how progressive they are probably isn’t all that progressive.

10) There are a few EMS systems out there that aren’t worth keeping.  Start over from scratch.  Washington DC. Cough. Washington DC. Cough.

11) The current EMS educational models and examination models give a de facto veto to whichever state has the lowest standards.

12) The most overlooked aspect of an EMS student’s educational experience is their set of clinical rotations.

13) Pain management matters.  Having said that, EMS providers need a non-narcotic option as well.

14) As long as people are willing to accept substandard working conditions, substandard working conditions will exist.  In other words, if you don’t like parking on a street corner for 12+ hours, don’t work there.

15) You cannot build an EMS system without taking care of your medics.  Period.

16) In the overwhelming majority of cases, communities get the EMS system they pay for. A suburban bedroom community that chooses to only have a BLS volunteer service shouldn’t act surprised when a crew isn’t available at 3:00 PM.

17) Until the average EMS provider can use, pronounce, and spell medical terminology with something approximating intelligible English, we shouldn’t be surprised when our healthcare colleagues seem hesitant to trust us with high-risk procedures like intubation and surgical airways.

18) The follow-on to #17 is that we need to prove ourselves competent with our current skill-set in emergency medicine before we can legitimately expect to be entrusted with the expanded scope of practice in community paramedicine or critical care.

19) We’re fooling ourselves when we have providers who want EMS to be able to refuse to treat or transport “low acuity” patients while at the same time parroting the phrase, “We don’t diagnose.”

20) If we truly have a national EMS exam and a common educational standard, reciprocity across state lines should be a virtual given.  Artificial barriers and hurdles established by state licensing entities represent one of the banes of EMS — turf protection.

Final one….

21) Turf protection wars (fire versus other delivery models, private versus public, BLS versus ALS, ad nauseum) will end up proving Ben Franklin’s adage about hanging together rather than hanging separately.

 

Thinking outside the box on community paramedicine

I’ve been discussing pain management options with a friend of mine who’s got an anesthesia background prior to entering the EMS world.  We were both bemoaning how EMS doesn’t always excel at managing chronic pain and how our options are, in most cases, limited to one or two opiates.  (And let’s not even talk about how some EMS systems still aren’t medicating abdominal pain.)

Let’s take the average chronic pain patient who calls EMS because of an issue involving breakthrough pain.  Even in the most progressive EMS systems in the US, the average paramedic’s knowledge of chronic pain is limited and their options are even more limited.  I work in a very progressive rural EMS system and my options are, by and large, limited to dosages of Fentanyl, potentially accompanied by Versed for anxiety related to the pain.  In these cases, an opiate, whether or not accompanied by a benzodiazepine, is probably not the best solution long-term for the patient.  Additionally, you’ve basically put the patient in a situation where they’re now going to be transported by EMS, creating an arguably unnecessary EMS and ER bill.

So, there’s got to be a better way, right?  I’m no expert, but here’s my idea.  This might be a perfect model for community paramedicine and/or advanced practice paramedics to get involved.  My paradigm would have these medics working as adjuncts of the local pain management clinic(s).  In a case where the patient is likely experiencing an episode of breakthrough pain related to a chronic pain diagnosis, a community paramedic could be dispatched instead of or in addition to the 911 ambulance response, depending on local dispatch practices.  The community medic would have additional training on managing chronic pain and an expanded scope of practice for such.  In cases where the patient is already working with the local pain management practice, the community medic would be a resource for whatever “safety net” of medications and interventions exist in the patient’s pain management plan for breakthrough pain.  For patients who don’t have a pain management home, a call such as this would be an opportunity for the community medic to provide some enhanced pain management options AND get the patient into the local pain management practice.

Idealistic?  Probably.  Would it require a lot of groundwork to get this set up?  Absolutely.   Regardless, I do think it’s an idea that meets an unmet need in virtually every community.  And as I understand it, community paramedicine projects are supposed to be meeting unmet mobile integrated healthcare needs.

Tell me how/why this wouldn’t work?

Paraprofessionalism

Got into another great discussion online earlier about all the additional things that paramedics could do, if only they’d be trained to do them.

That’s the problem.  Professionals don’t just do things.  They know which things to do, when to do them, and they know more than one thing to do for a variety of problems.

In my “real” life away from the ambulance and the blog, I’m an attorney. I know a lot of different things about the law, including things about the areas of law that I don’t practice in.  (The bar exam is a general test of legal competence, not specialization, and rightfully so.)  Yes, it’s entirely possible to create a business entity or a will using software.  It’s also equally possible that said computer program or even a paralegal might not catch some subtle nuance of tax law or community property law that would require changes to the document you’re asking for.

The point is that professionals have a breadth of knowledge about their field.  Paraprofessionals have been trained, usually by learning skills and protocols, how to deal with a variety of situations determined to be “routine” to their career field.  In other words, for paramedics, we learn how to deal with trauma, cardiac emergencies, respiratory difficulty, and a few other so-called common emergencies.  We learn some basic skills for dealing with them such as some forms of airway management, defibrillation, medication administration, bandaging, and splinting.  What we don’t know as paramedics is what we don’t know that perhaps a physician might know.

Thus, as a professional in another field outside of emergency medicine, I cringe a little when I hear my fellow paramedics say how much more they could do if only someone would give them the training.

For any paraprofessional to be trusted to “do more,” there has to be the trust from the overseeing profession.  How do we acquire that trust?  To me, the answer is twofold — we continue to educate ourselves and we recognize our limitations.   Please note that I say education, not training.   A trained chimp can put a tube in a hole.  An educated professional knows when to put the tube in the hole, which kind of tube to put in which kind of hole, and if a tube in the hole is even the right solution to the problem.  And let’s not even go into whether the hole in the patient is the main problem.

As long as EMS continues to advocate that we be trained to do more piecemeal rather than becoming more educated, we will remain paraprofessionals.  Sadly, in many cases, that also means that the rest of the medical world (and perhaps the public) continues to see us as ambulance drivers.

 

On clinical hypocrisy

EMS systems, especially ones with big PR machines, like to claim how their clinical guidelines or protocols and their style of medicine are process driven.  Heck, one of the current trends in medicine that I really like are checklists because they remind us how to do the process right each and every time, thus accounting for human error.  These checklists and processes mean that, in theory, consistent patient care is delivered.  Consistency is important.  Heck, consistency explains why you stop at a fast food chain when traveling — you know what you’re going to get.

So, in theory, I like process-driven. Process-driven means you’re thinking about the big picture.  It means you’re accounting for the fact that your providers are human.  As such, humans make mistakes and need reminders, especially when you’re in the last hour of an overnight shift and you’ve been running without food, drink, or sleep for a while.

Here’s the rub.  When someone reports a clinical error in a process-driven system, should the outcome or harm to the patient matter?  Does a medication error become less serious when the patient doesn’t die?  Or, on the other hand, if you violate the process and the patient improves, does that mean there’s no clinical error?  It pains me to say that these claims of process-driven medicine are sometimes just that — claims.

When you lessen the consequences to your medics/employees because the patient wasn’t harmed, it’s not process-driven.  It’s not a “just culture” environment.  What it is is hypocrisy.  That’s right.  Hypocrisy.  Google defines it as: “the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one’s own behavior does not conform.”

What should EMS define these events as where the process is violated, but there’s no harm to the patient?  The simple answer from this attorney/medic is that you count your blessings, do a root cause analysis of how and where the failure occurred, and remediate, reeducate, or discipline as appropriate.

Here’s what The Joint Commission says:  “A sentinel event is an unexpected occurrence involving death or serious physical or psychological injury, or the risk thereof.  Serious injury specifically includes loss of limb or function.  The phrase, “or the risk thereof” includes any process variation for which a recurrence would carry a significant chance of a serious adverse outcome.  Such events are called “sentinel” because they signal the need for immediate investigation and response.”

Until we consider clinical errors to be sentinel events that warrant investigation and response based not solely on bad outcome, but on “risk thereof,” we’re fooling ourselves into complacency.  Most importantly, we’re failing our patients.  “There but for the grace of God go I” should not be a reassuring whisper to oneself after an error occurs without harm to the patient.  Rather, it should be the words that strike fear into one’s conscience to make sure such a sentinel event is investigated, remediated, and addressed such that it may never happen again.

On volunteering

A couple of the EMS websites have been talking about the lack of volunteers in EMS these days.  Each of them cite different matters as to why EMS volunteerism is on the decline.  Most cite either declining community involvement or the ever-so-popular red herring of “increased educational requirements.”  Several years ago, I wrote a piece on developing a volunteer program in EMS systems, especially those that are combination paid and volunteer staffing.  Since no one ever picked it up for publication, I present it here as discussion fodder for the dirty unwashed masses of the Internet.

 

Introduction

Ever since Benjamin Franklin founded the first volunteer fire department in 1736 (the Union Fire Company), the United States has had a long, illustrious history of volunteers in public safety, whether volunteer firefighters, volunteer EMS providers, or even volunteer (or reserve) law enforcement officers.

However, as time has progressed, many organizations that started out as exclusively volunteer have since progressed to either a fully paid department or a department that has volunteers in name only.

I’ve had the privilege to work primarily as a volunteer in EMS, mostly because I’m employed in a profession outside of emergency medicine that I’m unwilling to give up. (Honestly, with as much as I didn’t enjoy taking the bar exam twice, I’m loathe to give up being an attorney for a full-time career as a paramedic!) I’ve had a variety of experiences in volunteer organizations, ranging from being “merely” a field provider (both at the EMT and EMT-P levels) to coordinating a volunteer program and serving on the board of directors of a fire department.

In my opinion, it’s actually easier to start or reinvigorate a volunteer program for EMS than it is for the fire service or law enforcement.   While in some states, there are different training and certification requirements for volunteer firefighters or reserve peace officers, the certification standards for EMS providers are almost invariably the same, whether you are full-time, part-time, or volunteer.

Justifications for Volunteer Programs

There are many reasons to have a volunteer program within your EMS organization, even if you’re primarily a career department.   The first is quite simple – additional manpower. Whether it’s staffing an additional crew member on each truck to assist with patient care or putting up additional ambulances during a disaster or peak volume event, volunteers provide a cost-effective way to supplement your career staff.

Additionally, volunteer programs can help control overtime costs and provide coverage for special events. One of my proudest accomplishments as the volunteer coordinator of an EMS agency was in ensuring that our volunteer providers staffed a PGA golf tournament held in our service area. Previously, our organization relied on our paid staff to cover this event, usually resulting in significant overtime expenses. With a lot of cajoling, coaxing, and some begging, the 2011 event was covered almost exclusively with volunteers aside from a few advanced life support positions covered with management/administrative staff who modified their work schedules for that week.

Almost the exact opposite story happened during the 2011 wildfires around Austin, Texas. Over the years, the other fire departments in Travis County surrounding Austin have transitioned from being almost exclusively volunteer to being small paid departments with relatively small (3-4 firefighters) duty crews staffing each apparatus.   The presumption has always been that, in a major incident, each department would provide mutual aid to the other. Over the past few years, most of these county departments had allowed their volunteer programs to dwindle to a few members, if not completely disappear. When the fires hit the Austin area (the Bastrop County fires, the Spicewood and Steiner Ranch fires in western Travis County, as well as several fires in nearby Williamson County), the majority of the surrounding fire departments were completely taxed for resources, with mutual aid resources coming from all over the state, including the Houston and Dallas areas. In fact, in Travis County, most EMS calls no longer received basic life support first response from the fire department. Of course, in a disaster such as this, it’s extremely unlikely that the event can be managed exclusively with local personnel. Regardless though, the ability to supplement local responders with volunteers, even for covering BLS EMS first response or firefighter rehab and scene logistics would have alleviated some of the manpower issues, freeing up firefighters for front-line duty.

Another possible role for volunteers is to expand your organization’s services. Volunteer providers can be an invaluable resource for covering public relations and community outreach events that might not otherwise be able to be covered. Additionally, volunteers can serve a crucial role in an EMS organization’s education programs, whether serving as “patients” in simulations, helping with skills practice and examinations, or even serving as instructors, provided they have the required qualifications. In fact, by conducting CPR or EMS courses, some of your volunteers may progress from saving your department money to actually making money!

And in more than organization I’ve been affiliated with, the volunteer program often serves as a ready-made hiring pool. A volunteer program allows for you to hire paid from a group of providers who are already within the organization and have at least been somewhat oriented to the organization. Additionally, for those volunteers who joined looking for a paid position, hiring from within serves as a motivation to stay active and involved.

Motivations of Volunteers

Based on my years in both fire and EMS departments as a volunteer, I’ve found that most volunteers fall into one of three categories. First, there are those volunteers who are volunteering as a way to get experience and/or a foothold to apply for a full-time paid position. Second, there are those volunteers who just enjoy EMS (or the fire service) and want to stay active and involved despite having a career other than being an EMS provider or firefighter. Finally, there are those volunteers who are community-minded and just want to volunteer with an organization. Some of these volunteers would be equally likely to join another community organization if they weren’t involved with EMS.

Particularly for younger (whether in age or experience) EMS providers, a volunteer EMS position is almost like an internship. It gives them the opportunity to gain experience and find out if EMS is right for them. These volunteers should be encouraged to ride with crews who set good examples to emulate. Also, since these volunteers aren’t yet on the payroll, take the time to expose them to other aspects of your EMS organization. When I was a volunteer coordinator, I often encouraged these new volunteers to spend part of a shift observing the communications center, riding with a critical care team to observe that aspect of EMS operations, or riding with a supervisor to expose them to high acuity patients. (In the service that I served as volunteer coordinator with, supervisors were automatically assigned to respond to certain high acuity calls including cardiac arrest, high mechanism collisions, and shootings.)

Occasionally, there are just some volunteers who just enjoy EMS (or the fire service) despite having another career. Some of these people are former full-time providers and some are just people who got “bit by the bug” and want to volunteer. These volunteers often end up as the core of your volunteer program. Since EMS is an avocation to them, they are often passionate about EMS and go above and beyond to be involved with the organization, particularly in acquiring additional certifications and skills.

The community-minded volunteer can be a challenge to develop. Many of these volunteers primarily pursue lower-level certifications. My experience is that some of these volunteers are less interested in the patient care aspect of EMS operations and much more interested in the management, financial, and community service/public outreach aspects of the organization.

One other subset of volunteers exists, especially in college towns. Some people volunteer in EMS in the hopes that volunteering as an EMT will help their chances of being admitted to medical school or some other graduate education in healthcare. These volunteers often run the gamut from enthusiastic participants in patient care to being little more than uniformed ride-alongs. My experience is that the unmotivated of these volunteers often end up leaving shortly due to the time commitments that most organizations require of their volunteers. Having said that though, some of these volunteers may end up our future medical directors and as such, it probably benefits us to mentor them as much as possible and present as positive of a view of EMS as we can.

Perils and Pitfalls

One of the biggest issues that I’ve experienced is that some career personnel see the volunteers as a threat to their position. The easiest way to address this issue is to remember that, for most organizations, volunteers may be supplementing current resources. For example, at both Harris County Emergency Corps and Cypress Creek EMS, the overwhelming majority of volunteer EMS providers ride as a third crew member to assist in patient care. Both of these organizations take care to ensure that volunteers who wish to work as the second or primary crew member go through the exact same field training processes that paid providers do. It has been my experience that, in most cases, the paid staff often enjoys having a third crew member to assist with patient care, particularly with critical or multiple patients. Also, check with your crews to find out which of them enjoy having a third crew member to ride with them. One of the surest ways to run off or discourage a volunteer is to have them with a crew that doesn’t want them.  In other organizations, there can be a rush to put these new volunteers into a field training program to “clear” them to independent duty, which may discourage newer volunteers who might still want the “safety net” of being able to ride as a third crew member.

Scheduling can be another pitfall. At one department I volunteered with, there was no organized schedule for volunteers on the fire crew. Several days could go by with no volunteers at the station and then, particularly on weekends, more personnel would show up than could staff the first-out rig(s). An online/web-based schedule is an absolute must for a volunteer program. My personal experience is that such a schedule is most successful when a volunteer can sign up for the shifts on their own, even at the last minute. Additionally, until new volunteers get a feel for which crews they work well with, I encouraged volunteers to ask me if they needed recommendations on crews to ride with.

One of the biggest pitfalls I’ve observed in my experience is the lowered expectations that so many career staff have for volunteers. It rapidly becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. One must remind some volunteers occasionally that the same expectations exist regardless of payroll status as the certification status makes no differentiation. Volunteers should be expected, not encouraged, to participate in all aspects of EMS operations, including cleaning and restocking the truck.

A potential pitfall also exists with a lack of organizational support or buy-in. In some organizations, even with management’s support, the lack of buy-in from support staff can cause problems for the volunteer program as well as for the individual volunteer. These issues can range from getting uniforms issued, getting the new volunteer access to the various technology resources (electronic PCR, online scheduling, email, etc.), or even training requirements. If the senior/executive management is supportive of the volunteer program, a discreet conversation with them may alleviate the problem. For organizations that are fortunate enough to designate one person as the volunteer coordinator, the individual volunteer will experience less of this problem as the volunteer coordinator will be the interface between the individual volunteer and the organization’s support/staff functions.

Another issue arises when the volunteer coordinator is given the responsibility to develop the program but does not necessarily have the authority to manage the program. This issue may create difficulties with managing problem volunteers. When I first coordinated the volunteer program at one department, I was the point of contact, but did not have the ability to manage or discipline volunteers. After several instances of discussing problems with management as well as instances where there was no clearly identified person to “solve” a problem at that moment, I gradually received the authority to supervise and discipline volunteers. This is crucial if the volunteers are to truly see the volunteer coordinator as THE point of contact for the volunteer program.

Making it Work

I’ve found that the key to making a volunteer program work is flexibility. As I’ve commented more than once to other medics and to management, “It’s not as if you were paying these people to come in anyway.” In other words, you may need to work with your volunteers on a variety of issues.

At times, some volunteers, particularly those enrolled in school, may need to take time off. My philosophy when serving as a volunteer coordinator was that I would never drop a volunteer from the roster so long as they kept me updated as to their intentions.

The other absolutely essential ingredient to a successful volunteer program is to designate one person as the volunteer coordinator. The volunteer coordinator should be both a single point of contact for volunteers as well as the organization’s internal advocate for the volunteer program.

In order to get volunteers “addicted” to the organization, it’s important to be able to get the volunteer out in the field while they are still eager after submitting their application. Departments that require an orientation class and/or significant probationary time prior to being able to go out in the field often lose volunteers. My greatest successes as a volunteer coordinator came when I was able to minimize the time between getting an application in and getting the newbie in the field. I accomplished this by placing much of the volunteer orientation material in an electronic format to send to the volunteer rather than making them attend an orientation class on a specific day. In fact, on more than one occasion, a motivated new volunteer could be on an ambulance as a third crew member in less than a week. In addition to the required topics such as equal opportunity, blood borne pathogens, and HIPAA training, you should consider some operational matters such as equipment familiarization as part of the orientation as many volunteers may be completely new to EMS aside from their initial education which provided limited education as to EMS operations and almost certainly did not orient the volunteer provider to your organization’s operations in particular. When the volunteer rides as a third crew member supplementing the regular, the pitfalls of a “new guy” on the ambulance are somewhat lessened and the volunteer can benefit from the crew’s mentorship.

Another tip to operating a successful volunteer program is to find out what interests the volunteer. Never assume that the volunteer only wants to be a field provider. This means that your volunteer application should go well beyond asking for basic demographic information and certification verification. In my experience, the volunteer application should inquire as to the prospective volunteer’s other EMS training and certifications as well as their interests in the organization and any outside skills or hobbies. As a volunteer coordinator, I was fortunate enough to have one volunteer in particular who was absolutely overjoyed to cover public relations events, particularly for children. While she was an acceptable field provider, she really shined in the community education role, which ended up being much more of a service to the department. I’ve also had other volunteers who were certified as instructors in various EMS disciplines. Several of these volunteers became excellent instructors and even brought new training opportunities to the organization. Two of my volunteers were also photographers who we relied upon for public relations and training photos. Some of the best advice I remember about using volunteers came from Chief Buddy Crain, the chief of CE-Bar Volunteer Fire Department near Austin, who told me that he could almost always find a use for anyone who wanted to volunteer with his department.

Chief Crain also gave me an additional piece of advice that I strove to live by when I coordinated a volunteer program, namely that it should not cost anyone to volunteer. Chief Crain, being the chief of a well-funded department, was often able to “spoil” his volunteers with a variety of uniforms, personally issued medical bags, radios, pagers, and opportunities to attend outside continuing education. Regardless of funding, volunteers should not have to expend their personal funds for their basic uniforms and equipment. And if funding permits, additional uniform items such as jackets or the opportunity to attend outside educational offerings serve as excellent tokens of thanks to valued volunteers who continue to contribute to the organization. One organization that I’ve been involved with both at the EMT and paramedic levels provides a small gas stipend to its volunteers, most of who come from nearby communities.

Recruiting is crucial in maintaining a volunteer base. Most organizations currently maintain a web presence which may include a volunteer recruiting aspect. In this current age of social media, outreach via Facebook or YouTube may be particularly helpful in reaching the younger or more technologically savvy potential volunteer.   Organizations that I’ve been involved with have also found college-based EMS education programs a ready source of volunteers. Many of the students in the paramedic programs are ready and eager to get 911 EMS experience while still in school once they get their EMT-B certification. However, the best source of new volunteers almost always comes from current, happy volunteers. Just like in any business endeavor, word of mouth is still the most powerful advertisement for any organization.

And once you get your volunteer core developed, it’s time to recognize your superstars for their hard work as best as you can. Of course, volunteers don’t typically get financial compensation, but there are other ways to provide recognition. As previously discussed, some volunteers begin volunteering as a way to get a foot in the door for a paid career. If these volunteers perform well, the easiest reward is to transition them to a paid position. Other volunteers can be recognized at department awards events and banquets. In fact, I’ve seen more than one department that offers a “volunteer of the year” award, often with a plaque, small gift, and perhaps a medal/ribbon to wear on their uniform. Other volunteers who regularly contribute to their organizations can be recognized inexpensively with new titles and responsibilities. For instance, a volunteer medic who has covered many of the organization’s public relations events could become the community relations coordinator. In other departments, I’ve seen volunteers promoted into officer ranks such as lieutenant, captain, or shift captain. In my own experience at one department, I was given the opportunity to go through the field training process to transition from being a third crew member to being part of a two person crew. (Credentialing several volunteers to work as part of a two person crew or even to function solely as a driver ended up saving the department significant overtime costs.)

Conclusion

In short, it is more than possible for a combination department to continue to succeed with a volunteer program. A successful volunteer program provides additional resources to any department, whether in providing its core services to the public or providing services above and beyond what the department could provide with its paid staff.  Organizational commitment and a willingness to be flexible will help an organization recruit and retain volunteers who end up being more than just ride-alongs wearing the same uniform.

Trust, but verify?

Recently, there’s been a fair amount of discussion about continuing education in EMS.  Having to maintain licenses in two very different professions gives me some unique perspective. (At least I think so…)

For EMS providers in Texas, there are several ways to maintain ones certification. Retesting is an option.  There’s also an option for a refresher course, although I rarely see them offered.   Texas also allows for renewal through continuing education hours or by maintaining one’s National Registry, which presents its own options for continuing education hours or retesting.

To add to this, for either Texas or National Registry, the continuing education hours have to be spread out over certain content areas.   At the most abstract level, this makes sense because most EMS providers rarely get to choose the patients, illnesses, or injuries they encounter.

Now, on top of these requirements, which are overall rational and, for the most part, are practical to maintain (We’ll leave out NR’s arbitrary limits on online CE hours), some EMS systems maintain their own additional requirements for continuing education.  The most onerous I’ve seen require providers to maintain certain “card courses” and to complete a minimum number of hours of CE each year, regardless of what recertification option the individual EMS provider chooses.  These hours are verified on a yearly basis by the submission of the respective CE certificates. This same system requires all of its providers to maintain a CPR card and a PHTLS (That’s “PreHospital Trauma Life Support” for the non-EMS readers) card.  Paramedics are also required to maintain a pediatrics card course card and an ACLS card.  To their credit, though, this EMS system also has some relatively advanced protocols.

The State Bar of Texas provides the following guidance regarding “minimum continuing legal education:”

Every active State Bar of Texas member must complete a minimum of 15 hours of accredited CLE during each MCLE compliance year.

    • 12 of these hours must be in accredited CLE classes
    • 3 of these hours must be in legal ethics/legal professional responsibility
    • 3 of these hours, including 1 hour of legal ethics, could be in self study.

That’s it.  No description of what the courses have to include or address, although the State Bar does have an approval process for CLE classes.  No mandates, aside from ethics, as to what attorneys need to study up on, although most attorneys either take classes on topics relevant to their practice or their personal interests.  And in my twelve plus years of practicing law, I’ve never seen an employer mandate certain classes for attorneys or mandate a certain number of hours.  (Of course, if the employer is paying for the course, they will only pay for courses that they think are appropriate.)

So, when you look at it solely from the continuing education standpoint, ask yourself, which of these two careers is a profession?  And more importantly from the EMS side, does your EMS system really trust you, protocols aside, if they have to tell you exactly what courses they expect of you and how many hours you need each year and want to see the certificates each year?  Granted, there are probably specific people who’ve caused such policies to be enacted, but to me, being a professional means more than being trusted with cool drugs or interventions.  It means you’re trusted and expected to be responsible for your own professional development.  If you can’t be responsible for your own development in your profession, how can your employer trust you?  More importantly, should an employer want employees who need that much direction on how to maintain their certification?

That’s a professional debate worth having.  Let the debate begin.

Discussion fodder

I was recently discussing the role of EMS with a surgeon friend of mine and we ended up discussing the beauty of the radio/cell phone patient report versus the handoff at the hospital.  Like many providers, I’ve had instances where nursing staff demands information from me or demands that I take a set of vital signs for them on the hospital’s equipment.  Combine that with some of the nursing discussions about nurses considering EMS to be “unlicensed personnel” that can’t be delegated tasks and you’ll get the spirit of the rant I’m sharing with y’all for discussion fodder.

 

At some point, the physicians need to step up, put the nurses in their places, and remind them that EMS providers work under a physician’s delegation, and don’t work for (and aren’t subordinate to) nursing staff.

 

I am working on another, longer post soon. In the meanwhile, though, I wanted to get some discussion going about the role and place of EMS.  And a controversial, blunt post seems to be the way to drive up the readership….

Paramedicine. The challenge.

I’ve been reading some comments on my blog today.  The commenter is also an EMS blogger.  He happens to be an EMT who’s currently back in school to become a physician’s assistant.  He and I have been engaging in a bit of a debate about the role of BLS versus ALS in prehospital care. From my reading (and we all know how perception and tone sometimes get lost on the Internet), he’s one of the people who believes that good BLS care is the critical component of any EMS system.  I respectfully say there’s more to being a good provider than good BLS care.  I also assert that there’s more to an EMS system than good BLS care or good cardiac arrest survival stats.

I’m not one of those types who likes the shopworn EMS t-shirt slogans like “BLS before ALS,” “Paramedics save lives and EMTs save paramedics,” or the all-time classic, “Do you want to talk to the paramedic in charge or the EMT who knows what’s going on?”   First of all, the BLS versus ALS dichotomy, seems to me, to be another example of the inherent bias against education and professional advancement in EMS.  That, somehow, the core principles that an instructor tries to convey via “Death By PowerPoint” in a 120-160 hour training class are the only things that matter in emergency medicine and that it’s admirable, nay, even noble to focus solely on this limited set of medical knowledge.  The “low information voter” of these types claims that’s all they need to know.  The sophomoric (Greek for “wise fool”) EMT advocate claims that the science and studies show that advanced life support care doesn’t make a difference.  The science and studies may provide proof of this conjecture for cardiac arrest care, but that’s the low-hanging fruit of studies for out-of-hospital medicine.  Dead or not dead.  But that’s defining EMS success based on a very small subset of our calls — salvageable patients in cardiac arrest.  (And for success there, we’re better off just putting AEDs in public places and mandating CPR training for the public.)

For better or worse, like much of medicine, what we do isn’t easily quantified into a study.  How can you measure the pain you took away from an elderly patient with a hip fracture that you administered Fentanyl to prior to moving them?  How do you measure the symptom relief you provided to a congestive heart failure patient with CPAP and nitroglycerin?  These anecdotal differences are why medicine remains a learned profession that cannot be distilled into a mere science.  Science gives us the information and knowledge to provide care to another.

Being a paramedic is a mindset.  It’s possessing the full armament of prehospital knowledge.  It’s knowing when to use, and more importantly, not use an intervention.  It’s using the resources you have on scene.  It’s knowing when you need additional resources.  It’s managing your partner, regardless of their certification level. It may even be calling a doctor for a consult or orders.  Most notably, it’s a set of skills, knowledge, and competencies that can’t be learned in a 120-160 hour course.  Heck, in my personal, non-researched opinion, graduating from paramedic school makes you only competent enough to spend the next year or so in a high volume, high acuity EMS system honing your abilities and skills under the tutelage of a mentor.  Nope.  Not a FTO.  Field training is merely orienting the provider to a particular EMS system.  You need the mentorship to learn the craft of being the highest level of care outside of a clinical setting. Paramedic education teaches the fundamental knowledge and skills.  Tutelage under a mentor makes you a master at the job.  It’s the difference between knowing how to perform a rapid sequence intubation and looking at a patient and realizing that they’re in danger of losing their airway.

Paramedicine, or prehospital care, is like all of medicine, more than mere science. It’s the application of scientific knowledge to real people.  And the world of paramedicine adds in the confounding factor of applying this knowledge to people in the nonclinical setting.  The choreography of EMS is the challenge.  Until you’ve picked up the baton as the lead paramedic to conduct the prehospital symphony of your partner, first responders, firefighters, cops, the patient, and hysterical bystanders/family, you’ll never understand the challenge — nor can you understand the sheer joy of it.  If you’re an EMT, pick up the challenge and advance professionally.  Otherwise, I will politely and respectfully ask you to defer to my prerogatives as the lead.  That doesn’t mean that we can’t discuss patient care. It doesn’t even mean that I don’t want to hear your ideas on scene.  What it does mean is that we’re not in a democracy and that with my increased knowledge and responsibility comes the decision making authority.

Thanks for reading, y’all.